I read the article on weblogs this morning from Forbes Magazine, “Attack of the Blogs(Attack of the Blogs)”:http://www.forbes.com/forbes/2005/1114/128_print.html. What I didn’t realize (and no else reading just this article would), is the obvious involvement that Lyons has in the story. From reading “Is Daniel Lyons a loser?(Is Daniel Lyons a loser?)”:http://www.thejemreport.com/mambo/content/view/174/42/ and “Daniel Lyons is Not A Fanatic. He’s Just From Another Planet.(Daniel Lyons is Not A Fanatic. He’s Just From Another Planet.)”:http://www.digitaldivide.net/blog/Taran/view?PostID=6988, you quickly find that valid questions about his objectivity have existed for quite a while. It is always unfortunate when those who cover the news become a part of the story. It is even worse when they actively try to use their position as a reporter to advoce their position. That is obviously what Lyons is doing here.