Remember how I said last week I wasn’t worried about libraries disappearing? Well, take a look at the ATIZ BookDrive. It obviously means I was wrong and libraries are done and I need to get to work on polishing up my resume and… Or maybe not. It does look kind of cool, though. I am curious to see how well it works when distribution begins.
Comments Off
Posted in Technology-Issues
Remember Mr. Safe? Apparently, no one has spoken with the gentleman in quite a while. Sam Ruby decided to take some time and have a conversation with him. The results are interesting and informative. I have been thinking about the whole Harvard aspect of this. Dave Winer deeded the RSS 2.0 specification there after complaints that RSS should not be under the control of a single vendor. Apparently, Dave picked Harvard for three reasons: 1) they were not a vendor, 2) he happened to be working there at the time and 3) no one would confuse them with a legitimate standards body. But they also have something less than an unbiased view at this point. I certainly can’t predict what is going to happen, but I do think the balance may starting tipping soon.
Comments Off
Posted in Knowledge Management
Shelley Powers has taken a look at the RSS controversy du jour and offers a take in a style all her own.
bq.But hark? What’s this? What’s this rumble in the distance. Oh, no! It’s Big Dog, and he’s got his lawyer! But the Lawyer brings no books or suits or habius, or even corpses. He opens the door long enough to make statement, and the moves on to other things that come ten by ten. The statement? Nothing has changed on RSS 2.0. Harvard still owns it, but the community may do what they will within the bounds of a Creative Commons license. Leading to, (now pay attention, this is going to go fast)… – Shelley Powers To me, this whole thing started with a single statement three years ago.
bq.The one part I didn’t understand is what he meant by Six Apart and Blogger not doing “RSS exactly as UserLand does.” Maybe RSS needs a standards body, after all. – Me Within the next month, the Atom project had begun.
bq.My support is, unsurprisingly, also partly based on politics. The recent flap about funky RSS just highlights the ongoing political quagmire of weblog tech, and the importance of having an open format that is not controlled by a single vendor. Vendor neutrality is particularly important now, as weblogs break into the mainstream. Weblogging is becoming its own industry, one where interoperability can no longer be solved simply by calling up a friend or dashing off a quick email. And one where no one needs to tolerate the sort of FUD we’ve seen in the past few weeks. – Mark Pilgrim RSS never did solve the issues to anyone’s satisfaction. Instead, things only got worse.
bq.It appears that the only company with no plans to release a proprietary version of RSS is Google. – Me Apparently, everyone is supposed to accept that the RSS 2.0 Specification was brought down from the mountaintop after being inscribed on stone tablets by some sort of XML diety. And anyone who questions anything is to be considered some sort of heretical apostate. This attitude has slowed the adoption of RSS for years now. And there has been simply no need for any of this.
Comments Off
Posted in Knowledge Management