PageRank Hate

Over at Tenchnobiblio, there is an interesting discussion on “linking to sites with content you oppose(Link Censorship)”:http://www.technobiblio.com/archives/000137.html and how that actually improves their status on search engines. I went through a similar thought process two years ago on an entry about “French Censorship Plans(French Censorship Plans)”:http://www.libraryplanet.com/2001/06/french. At the time, I did not like to the …

rel=”nofollow”

Last week, Dave Winer made a “rather cryptic post(Last night I got)”:http://archive.scripting.com/2005/01/14#When:11:45:23AM about something we would be hearing about very soon. After several days of speculation, Google has gone public with their announcement about “preventing comment spam(http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html)”:http://www.google.com/googleblog/2005/01/preventing-comment-spam.html. Basically, links tagged with rel=”nofollow” will not be followed. No following, no indexing. No indexing, no PageRank. No …

Nigritude Ultramarine

Anil is trying to be number one for “Nigritude Ultramarine(Nigritude Ultramarine)”:http://www.dashes.com/anil/2004/06/04/nigritude_ultra. I don’t always approve of playing games with PageRank, but it is should be an interesting test of the power of the blogosphere if we can indeed boost his ranking. I have one entry that I entitled strictly to get a high google ranking: …

Search-Engine Writing

So many people spend so much time trying to boost their PageRank with all sorts of goofy and annoying “tactics(The War on Spam)”:http://www.libraryplanet.com/2003/10/spam. John Gruber has discovered the “true secret(Writing for Google)”:http://daringfireball.net/2004/05/writing_for_google. All you have to do is write about things that people are going to be looking for. That is one of the reasons …